This page contains the evaluation results for the course Perl that was taught in the Winter term of 2000 at CNTS - Language Technology Group at The University of Antwerp. The purpose of this page if to give a summarized overview of the responses of the students on the course.
Summary of the answers to multiple choice questions of the final evaluation forms for the course Perl 2000. There were 24 students and 15 have participated in the evaluation.
These tables show how may people have chosen the different answer options with each question.
Q1 Q2 Q3 ---------------------------------------- More 6 6 1 More Same number 9 5 9 Same number Less 0 0 2 Less No opinion 0 4 3 No opinion ---------------------------------------- Average 70 77 46 Average Q4 Q5 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q15 Q17 Q18 ----------------------------------------------------------------- Very good/me 4 6 2 2 5 6 7 2 Very good/me Good/meaning 6 7 9 6 7 5 8 11 Good/meaning Not so good/ 3 0 4 2 0 3 0 2 Not so good/ Bad/meaningl 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Bad/meaningl No opinion 2 2 0 5 3 0 0 0 No opinion ----------------------------------------------------------------- Average 69 82 62 67 81 69 82 67 Average Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 ------------------------------------------------- Yes 11 13 4 8 0 Yes No 1 0 7 3 11 No No opinion 3 2 4 4 4 No opinion ------------------------------------------------- Average 92 100 36 72 0 Average Q6: Very difficult: 3; difficult: 7; Ok: 3; No answer: 2; Average: 75
Each answer option has received a weight in order to be able to calculate the average answers. The options in questions with five alternatives have received weights 100, 75, 50, 25 and 0; questions with four alternatives: 100, 200/3, 100/3 and 0; and questions with two alternatives: 100 and 0. The average answer is the one that is closest to the average of all answer numbers. Empty answers have been counted as no opinion. From multiple answers, we choose the right-most option (usually the worst one mentioned).