Other years:
2005 |
2006
LTP2005: Evaluation results
This page contains the evaluation results for the course
Language Technology Project 2005
that was taught in the final four weeks of the first semester of the
educational year 2004-2005 at the University of Amsterdam.
The purpose of this page is to give a summarized overview of the
responses of the students on the course.
Only answers to multiple choice questions have been listed here.
Questions
- The planning of the project I consider: (poor, neutral, good).
- The link with other classes I consider: (poor, neutral, good).
- The project is well organized as to the presentation of subject
matter and the assignment:s (not true, neutral, agreed).
- Our team did work in a cooperative atmosphere: (not true, neutral,
agreed).
- The cooperation in our team had a positive effect on the project
results: (not true, neutral, agreed).
- I give the teacher of the course the following grade: (1-10).
- The projects are well organized as to means of literature, readers,
lab sessions: (not true, neutral, agreed).
- The number of credit points in relation to the level and the amount
of work for this project was: (too much, good, too little)
- How many hours on average did you spend on this project?
- The assessment is well in tune with the subject matter of the
project: (not true, neutral, agreed).
- My own contributions to the project have been assessed in a fair
way: (not true, neutral, agreed).
- My interest in the subject has: (decreased, remained, increased).
- In this project I have learned about co-operation, delegation and
planning of activities: (too little, enough, a lot).
- All in all I give this project the following grade: (1-10).
Answers
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q7 Q10 Q11
------------------------------------------------------
good/agreed 8 4 7 5 5 1 4 3
neutral/neutral 0 4 1 3 2 6 3 5
poor/not true 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
no answer 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0
------------------------------------------------------
avg(-100,+100) +100 +50 +88 +63 +63 +13 +50 +38
Q6: 6:1; 7:3; 8:1; 9:3. Average: 78
Q8: good:8
Q9: 15-20h:1; 20-25h:3; 25-35h:4. Average: 26h
Q12: remained:4; increased:4. Average: +50
Q13: too little:2; enough:2; a lot:4. Average: +25
Q14: 6:1; 7:3; 8:4. Average: 74
Last update: February 20, 2006,
erikt@science.uva.nl